<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: X11 woes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://softwarebashing.org/blog/2009/09/x11-woes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://softwarebashing.org/blog/2009/09/x11-woes/</link>
	<description>We hate software. With a passion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:38:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nitrox</title>
		<link>http://softwarebashing.org/blog/2009/09/x11-woes/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Nitrox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 11:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwarebashing.org/blog/?p=242#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Of course 2010 will be the year of Linux on the desktop. Just like 2009. And 2008. And 2007. And 2011 and onwards.  has been proclaimed the year of desktop Linux for a long time and why change an old tradition?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course 2010 will be the year of Linux on the desktop. Just like 2009. And 2008. And 2007. And 2011 and onwards.  has been proclaimed the year of desktop Linux for a long time and why change an old tradition?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.238 seconds -->

